Manchester City Council v Lee [2003] EWCA Civ 1256 (07 August 2003)
Section 152 Housing Act 1996 does not permit injunctions to protect persons residing in privately owned premises near council residential premises unless their activities are sufficiently connected to specific residential premises as defined by statute. The evidence in both cases did not establish the required nexus, so the statutory power was not engaged.
- Citation
- [2003] EWCA Civ 1256
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Manchester City Council; Defendant/respondent: Lewis Lee; Applicant/respondent: Wigan Metropolitan Borough Council; Respondent/appellant: G (a child by his litigation friend the Official Solicitor)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 August 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From County Court Judgments / Court of Appeal (civil Division)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in the Wigan case (G); appeal dismissed in the Manchester case (Lee)
- Legal Topics
- Anti Social Behaviour Injunctions, Interpretation of Section 152 Housing Act 1996, Nexus Between Protected Persons and Residential Premises
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Manchester City Council
Claimant/appellant
Lewis Lee
Defendant/respondent
Wigan Metropolitan Borough Council
Applicant/respondent
G (a child by his litigation friend the Official Solicitor)
Respondent/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal From County Court Judgments / Court of Appeal (civil Division)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Section 152 Housing Act 1996 permits injunctions to protect persons residing in privately owned premises near local authority residential premises
- 2 Whether a sufficient nexus exists between the activities of the threatened persons and residential premises as defined by statute
- 3 Appropriate form and scope of injunctions under Section 152
Ratio Decidendi
Section 152 Housing Act 1996 does not permit injunctions to protect persons residing in privately owned premises near council residential premises unless their activities are sufficiently connected to specific residential premises as defined by statute. The evidence in both cases did not establish the required nexus, so the statutory power was not engaged.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in the Wigan case (G); appeal dismissed in the Manchester case (Lee)
Orders
- No order for costs in the Manchester case (Lee)
- Respondent to pay appellant's costs in the Wigan case (G), to be assessed if not agreed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment