Birmingham City Council v Pardoe [2016] EWHC 3119 (QB) (05 December 2016)
Section 21(7) of the Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 is a transitional provision that does not prevent the court from considering evidence of conduct prior to 23 September 2014 where such evidence is relevant to proving qualifying behaviour after that date or to the court's evaluation of whether it is just and convenient to grant an injunction. The applicant must prove anti-social behaviour after 23 September 2014, but evidence of earlier conduct may be admissible for relevant purposes at both stages of the court's decision.
- Citation
- [2016] EWHC 3119 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Birmingham City Council; Defendant/appellant: Glenn Pardoe
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 December 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / High Court Appeal From County Court Preliminary Issue Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Anti Social Behaviour Injunctions, Transitional Provisions, Admissibility of Evidence, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Birmingham City Council
Claimant/respondent
Glenn Pardoe
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / High Court Appeal From County Court Preliminary Issue Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether section 21(7) of the Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 limits the court to considering only conduct occurring after 23 September 2014 when deciding whether to grant an injunction under section 1 of the Act
- 2 Whether evidence of conduct prior to 23 September 2014 can be considered at either or both stages of the court's decision under section 1
Ratio Decidendi
Section 21(7) of the Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 is a transitional provision that does not prevent the court from considering evidence of conduct prior to 23 September 2014 where such evidence is relevant to proving qualifying behaviour after that date or to the court's evaluation of whether it is just and convenient to grant an injunction. The applicant must prove anti-social behaviour after 23 September 2014, but evidence of earlier conduct may be admissible for relevant purposes at both stages of the court's decision.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment