London Borough of Brent v Doughan

London Borough of Brent v Doughan

The judge's decision that it was not reasonable to make a possession order based on two incidents of noise in 18 months, given the context and evidence, was tenable and not amenable to appeal. The judge correctly applied the statutory requirements and exercised her discretion appropriately. The committal applications were properly refused as the criminal standard was not met.

Parties
Claimant/appellant: London Borough of Brent; Defendant/respondent: Christopher Doughan
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
06 February 2007
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Anti Social Behaviour Injunctions, Possession Proceedings, Committal for Contempt, Reasonableness of Possession Orders
Landlord and Tenant Housing Law Civil Procedure Anti Social Behaviour Injunctions Possession Proceedings Committal for Contempt Reasonableness of Possession Orders

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

London Borough of Brent

Claimant/appellant

Christopher Doughan

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the County Court judge erred in refusing to make a possession order against the tenant for anti-social behaviour
  2. 2 Whether the judge erred in refusing committal applications for alleged breaches of injunctions
  3. 3 Whether the judge failed to consider relevant statutory factors under the Housing Act 1985

Ratio Decidendi

The judge's decision that it was not reasonable to make a possession order based on two incidents of noise in 18 months, given the context and evidence, was tenable and not amenable to appeal. The judge correctly applied the statutory requirements and exercised her discretion appropriately. The committal applications were properly refused as the criminal standard was not met.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Permission for committal applications refused