Muhammad Aksahin v London Borough of Enfield

Muhammad Aksahin v London Borough of Enfield

Appellant's presence as a passenger constituted participation in breach of the injunction, he had actual and constructive knowledge of the injunction, and the costs order and suspended committal were appropriate; no procedural irregularity or unfairness occurred.

Parties
Appellant/defendant: Muhammad Aksahin; Respondent/claimant: London Borough of Enfield
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
03 June 2026
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Anti Social Behaviour Injunctions, Car Cruising, Service of Injunctions, Contempt Proceedings, Costs Orders
Civil Procedure Contempt of Court Local Government Law Anti Social Behaviour Injunctions Car Cruising Service of Injunctions Contempt Proceedings Costs Orders

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Muhammad Aksahin

Appellant/defendant

London Borough of Enfield

Respondent/claimant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether passive presence as a passenger constitutes participation in breach of injunction
  2. 2 Whether appellant had knowledge of the injunction
  3. 3 Appropriateness of sanction and costs order

Ratio Decidendi

Appellant's presence as a passenger constituted participation in breach of the injunction, he had actual and constructive knowledge of the injunction, and the costs order and suspended committal were appropriate; no procedural irregularity or unfairness occurred.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Suspended committal for 14 days confirmed (now lapsed)
  • Costs order of £5,170.50 payable at £100 per month upheld