Unwired Planet International Ltd & Anor v Huawei Technologies Co Ltd & Ors [2017] EWHC 2831 (Pat) (12 October 2017)
Unwired Planet was, in substance, the winner of the anti-suit injunction application and is entitled to its costs for that application. The application to lift the stay was bound to fail, but was only made due to Huawei's conduct in commencing Chinese proceedings. Therefore, Unwired Planet should not recover its costs for the stay application, nor pay Huawei's costs for it. 70% of Unwired Planet's costs are attributable to the anti-suit injunction and should be awarded.
- Citation
- [2017] EWHC 2831 (Pat)
- Parties
- Claimant/first Applicant: Unwired Planet International Limited; Tenth Party/second Applicant: Unwired Planet, LLC; Defendant/first Respondent: Huawei Technologies Co. Limited; Defendant/second Respondent: Huawei Technologies (UK) Co. Limited; Third Respondent: Huawei Device Co. Limited; Fourth Respondent: Huawei Device (Dongguan) Co. Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 October 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Patent Litigation (interim Applications) / Post Compromise, Determination of Costs
- Outcome
- Costs order: Unwired Planet awarded 70% of its costs of the application, with an interim payment ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Anti Suit Injunction, FRAND Licensing, Costs Determination, Stay of Injunction, Jurisdiction, Standard Essential Patents (seps)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Unwired Planet International Limited
Claimant/first Applicant
Unwired Planet, LLC
Tenth Party/second Applicant
Huawei Technologies Co. Limited
Defendant/first Respondent
Huawei Technologies (UK) Co. Limited
Defendant/second Respondent
Huawei Device Co. Limited
Third Respondent
Huawei Device (Dongguan) Co. Limited
Fourth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Patent Litigation (interim Applications) / Post Compromise, Determination of Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Unwired Planet is entitled to an anti-suit injunction against Huawei regarding Chinese proceedings
- 2 Whether the stay of the injunction against Huawei should be lifted
- 3 How costs should be allocated following compromise of the substantive applications
Ratio Decidendi
Unwired Planet was, in substance, the winner of the anti-suit injunction application and is entitled to its costs for that application. The application to lift the stay was bound to fail, but was only made due to Huawei's conduct in commencing Chinese proceedings. Therefore, Unwired Planet should not recover its costs for the stay application, nor pay Huawei's costs for it. 70% of Unwired Planet's costs are attributable to the anti-suit injunction and should be awarded.
Court Disposition
Costs order: Unwired Planet awarded 70% of its costs of the application, with an interim payment ordered.
Orders
- Unwired Planet awarded 70% of its costs of the application.
- Interim payment ordered: 60% of 70% of £360,000 to be paid by Huawei.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment