Renaissance Securities (Cyprus) Ltd v Chlodwig Enterprises Ltd & Ors [2023] EWHC 2816 (Comm) (03 November 2023)
The court granted interim anti-suit and anti-anti-suit injunctions because the Defendants' Russian proceedings were in clear breach of English law-governed LCIA arbitration agreements, there was a high risk of pre-emptive Russian anti-suit relief if notice was given, and urgent, private, and alternative service orders were necessary to protect the contractual bargain and prevent irreparable harm, especially in the context of sanctions and the risk of enforcement difficulties.
- Citation
- [2023] EWHC 2816 (Comm)
- Parties
- Claimant/applicant: Renaissance Securities (Cyprus) Limited; Defendant/respondent: Chlodwig Enterprises Limited; Defendant/respondent: Adorabella Limited; Defendant/respondent: Gekolina Investments Ltd; Defendant/respondent: Dubhe Holdings Limited; Defendant/respondent: Owl Nebula Enterprises Limited; Defendant/respondent: Perpecia Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 November 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Court Arbitration Claim / Interim Application for Anti Suit and Anti Anti Suit Injunctions, Heard Without Notice
- Outcome
- Interim anti-suit and anti-anti-suit injunctions granted without notice; non-disclosure and alternative service orders granted; personal service dispensed with; return date to be fixed.
- Legal Topics
- Anti Suit Injunctions, Anti Anti Suit Injunctions, Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements, Sanctions, Service Out of Jurisdiction, Urgent Interim Relief
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Renaissance Securities (Cyprus) Limited
Claimant/applicant
Chlodwig Enterprises Limited
Defendant/respondent
Adorabella Limited
Defendant/respondent
Gekolina Investments Ltd
Defendant/respondent
Dubhe Holdings Limited
Defendant/respondent
Owl Nebula Enterprises Limited
Defendant/respondent
Perpecia Limited
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Arbitration Claim / Interim Application for Anti Suit and Anti Anti Suit Injunctions, Heard Without Notice
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether anti-suit injunction (ASI) should be granted to restrain Russian proceedings in breach of LCIA arbitration agreements governed by English law
- 2 Whether anti-anti-suit injunction (AASI) should be granted to prevent Defendants from seeking Russian anti-suit relief
- 3 Whether non-disclosure and alternative service orders are justified
Ratio Decidendi
The court granted interim anti-suit and anti-anti-suit injunctions because the Defendants' Russian proceedings were in clear breach of English law-governed LCIA arbitration agreements, there was a high risk of pre-emptive Russian anti-suit relief if notice was given, and urgent, private, and alternative service orders were necessary to protect the contractual bargain and prevent irreparable harm, especially in the context of sanctions and the risk of enforcement difficulties.
Court Disposition
Interim anti-suit and anti-anti-suit injunctions granted without notice; non-disclosure and alternative service orders granted; personal service dispensed with; return date to be fixed.
Orders
- Defendants restrained from pursuing Russian proceedings in breach of LCIA arbitration agreements (ASI)
- Defendants restrained from seeking or enforcing Russian anti-suit injunctions against RenSec (AASI)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment