Shipowners' Mutual Protection and Indemnity Association (Luxembourg) v Containerships Denizcilik Nakliyat VE Ticaret A.S. ("Yusuf Cepnioglu")
The right of direct action conferred by Turkish law is, in substance, contractual and circumscribed by the insurance contract; therefore, the charterers are bound by the English law arbitration clause and an anti-suit injunction is justified to restrain Turkish proceedings contrary to that clause.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Shipowners’ Mutual Protection and Indemnity Association (Luxembourg); Defendant/appellant: Containerships Denizcilik Nakliyat ve Ticaret A. S.
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 April 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court (commercial Court)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Anti Suit Injunctions, Direct Actions Against Insurers, Arbitration Clauses, Contractual Rights Under Foreign Statutes, Comity, Enforcement of Foreign Judgments
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shipowners’ Mutual Protection and Indemnity Association (Luxembourg)
Claimant/respondent
Containerships Denizcilik Nakliyat ve Ticaret A. S.
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court (commercial Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a right of direct action under Turkish law against an insurer is contractual or independent for the purposes of English law
- 2 Whether an anti-suit injunction should be granted to restrain Turkish proceedings in favour of London arbitration
Ratio Decidendi
The right of direct action conferred by Turkish law is, in substance, contractual and circumscribed by the insurance contract; therefore, the charterers are bound by the English law arbitration clause and an anti-suit injunction is justified to restrain Turkish proceedings contrary to that clause.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appellant’s appeal is dismissed
- Appellant to pay Respondent’s costs of the appeal on the standard basis, to be assessed if not agreed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment