A v OOO 'Insurance Company Chubb' & Ors

A v OOO 'Insurance Company Chubb' & Ors

The application for urgent interim anti-suit relief was not ready for fair determination due to procedural deficiencies, late and incomplete evidence, lack of clarity on legal issues and tests, and failure to comply with court guidelines. No compelling urgency or prejudice was established to justify proceeding today. The time crisis was largely of the applicant's own making.

Parties
Claimant: A; First Defendant: OOO 'Insurance Company Chubb'; Second Defendant: Chubb Russia Investments Limited; Third Defendant: Chubb European Group Se; Fourth Defendant: Chubb Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
15 October 2019
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Application for Anti Suit Injunction / Interim Application Hearing
Outcome
Application for urgent interim injunctive relief not granted; hearing adjourned for further directions.
Legal Topics
Anti Suit Injunctions, Arbitration Agreements, Jurisdiction, Urgent Interim Relief
International Arbitration Civil Procedure Anti Suit Injunctions Arbitration Agreements Jurisdiction Urgent Interim Relief

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

A

Claimant

OOO 'Insurance Company Chubb'

First Defendant

Chubb Russia Investments Limited

Second Defendant

Chubb European Group Se

Third Defendant

Chubb Limited

Fourth Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Court Application for Anti Suit Injunction / Interim Application Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether urgent interim anti-suit relief should be granted to restrain Russian proceedings allegedly in breach of London arbitration agreement
  2. 2 Whether the application should proceed ex parte or inter partes
  3. 3 Whether the governing law of the arbitration clause is relevant to the grant of anti-suit relief

Ratio Decidendi

The application for urgent interim anti-suit relief was not ready for fair determination due to procedural deficiencies, late and incomplete evidence, lack of clarity on legal issues and tests, and failure to comply with court guidelines. No compelling urgency or prejudice was established to justify proceeding today. The time crisis was largely of the applicant's own making.

Court Disposition

Application for urgent interim injunctive relief not granted; hearing adjourned for further directions.

Orders

  • No substantive orders made; further directions to be given for a future hearing.