O'Brien v Barnet County Court & Anor [2002] EWCA Civ 1255 (21 August 2002)
There was no credible evidence of actual or perceived bias by the district judge; the applicant's decision not to participate in the original hearing cannot be used as evidence of bias. The application for permission to appeal is hopeless.
- Citation
- [2002] EWCA Civ 1255
- Parties
- Claimant/applicant: Barry O'Brien; Defendant/respondent: Barnet County Court; Defendant/respondent: Challenger Group Holdings
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 August 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Permission to Appeal (judicial Review) / Court of Appeal (civil Division) Permission to Appeal From Refusal of Judicial Review
- Outcome
- Application for permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Apparent Bias, Judicial Impartiality, Permission to Appeal, Road Traffic Accident, Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Barry O'Brien
Claimant/applicant
Barnet County Court
Defendant/respondent
Challenger Group Holdings
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Permission to Appeal (judicial Review) / Court of Appeal (civil Division) Permission to Appeal From Refusal of Judicial Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the district judge was biased or appeared to be biased against the applicant
- 2 Whether refusal of permission to apply for judicial review was correct
Ratio Decidendi
There was no credible evidence of actual or perceived bias by the district judge; the applicant's decision not to participate in the original hearing cannot be used as evidence of bias. The application for permission to appeal is hopeless.
Court Disposition
Application for permission to appeal refused
Orders
- Application for permission to appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment