Parker v Synder & Ors

Parker v Synder & Ors

The trial judge's findings of fact, including assessments of witness credibility and the rejection of conspiracy and misrepresentation claims, were not shown to be wrong or unreasonable. The refusal to admit fresh evidence was a proper exercise of discretion, as the applicant had not acted with reasonable diligence and the evidence would not have affected the outcome. The appeal had no prospect of success and was refused.

Parties
Claimant/appellant: Barry Martin Parker; Defendant/respondent: Lawrence Stephen Snyder; Defendant/respondent: Andrea Siddons; Defendant/respondent: David Price
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
01 November 2005
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal and Substantive Appeal
Outcome
Appeal refused; application for permission to appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Appeal Against Dismissal of Claim, Adducing Fresh Evidence on Appeal, Conspiracy, Misrepresentation, Fiduciary Duties, Assessment of Witness Credibility
Civil Procedure Company Law Equity and Trusts Appeal Against Dismissal of Claim Adducing Fresh Evidence on Appeal Conspiracy Misrepresentation Fiduciary Duties +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Barry Martin Parker

Claimant/appellant

Lawrence Stephen Snyder

Defendant/respondent

Andrea Siddons

Defendant/respondent

David Price

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal and Substantive Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge erred in dismissing the claim for conspiracy and misrepresentation
  2. 2 Whether the trial judge erred in refusing to admit fresh evidence post-judgment
  3. 3 Whether the trial judge failed to draw appropriate inferences from the facts and erred in findings of fact

Ratio Decidendi

The trial judge's findings of fact, including assessments of witness credibility and the rejection of conspiracy and misrepresentation claims, were not shown to be wrong or unreasonable. The refusal to admit fresh evidence was a proper exercise of discretion, as the applicant had not acted with reasonable diligence and the evidence would not have affected the outcome. The appeal had no prospect of success and was refused.

Court Disposition

Appeal refused; application for permission to appeal dismissed