Countryside Alliance & Ors, R (on the application of) v HM Attorney General & Anor [2006] EWCA Civ 1096 (23 June 2006)
The appeals were dismissed because the Court found the Hunting Act 2004 compatible with the Human Rights Act and European Community law, and that justification for the legislative measures was established. The law was clear and the issues were for the judgment and assessment of the national court.
- Citation
- [2006] EWCA Civ 1096
- Parties
- Claimants/appellants: The Countryside Alliance & Ors; Defendants/respondent: HM Attorney General & Anr
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 June 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal and Application for Permission to Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division) Judgment on Appeals and Applications
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed; applications for permission to appeal refused; costs awarded to respondents; certain applications for permission to rely on further evidence granted.
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Procedure, Human Rights Act, European Community Law, Justification of Legislative Measures
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Countryside Alliance & Ors
Claimants/appellants
HM Attorney General & Anr
Defendants/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal and Application for Permission to Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division) Judgment on Appeals and Applications
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Hunting Act 2004 is compatible with the Human Rights Act and European Community law
- 2 Whether justification for the legislative measures was established
- 3 Whether permission to appeal to the House of Lords should be granted
Ratio Decidendi
The appeals were dismissed because the Court found the Hunting Act 2004 compatible with the Human Rights Act and European Community law, and that justification for the legislative measures was established. The law was clear and the issues were for the judgment and assessment of the national court.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed; applications for permission to appeal refused; costs awarded to respondents; certain applications for permission to rely on further evidence granted.
Orders
- C1/2005/2071 – Appeal dismissed.
- C1/2005/2072 – Appeal dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment