Burlo v Langley & Anor
The appeal is dismissed as there is no sufficient ground to overturn the EAT's decision; the agreed order on costs stands.
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Burlo; Defendant/respondent: Langley & Anr
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Procedure, Costs, Permission to Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Burlo
Claimant/appellant
Langley & Anr
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Appeal Tribunal's decision should be upheld
- 2 Entitlement to costs on appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is dismissed as there is no sufficient ground to overturn the EAT's decision; the agreed order on costs stands.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- No order as to costs save for CLS assessment of appellant’s costs
- Appellant may apply for permission to appeal to the House of Lords by 11 January 2007
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment