Bingham v Pieters [2001] EWCA Civ 1633 (26 October 2001)

Bingham v Pieters [2001] EWCA Civ 1633 (26 October 2001)

The applications were dismissed as the court was satisfied, after hearing submissions and reviewing skeleton arguments, that there was no merit in granting any of the applications.

Citation
[2001] EWCA Civ 1633
Parties
Claimant/applicant: Andrew Bingham; Defendant/respondent: Veronica Patricia Pieters
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
26 October 2001
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal, Extension of Time, and Amendment of Appellant's Notice
Outcome
Applications dismissed
Legal Topics
Appeals, Extension of Time, Amendment of Pleadings
Civil Procedure Appeals Extension of Time Amendment of Pleadings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Andrew Bingham

Claimant/applicant

Veronica Patricia Pieters

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal, Extension of Time, and Amendment of Appellant's Notice

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether permission to appeal should be granted
  2. 2 Whether extension of time for appealing should be allowed
  3. 3 Whether amendment of Appellant's Notice should be permitted

Ratio Decidendi

The applications were dismissed as the court was satisfied, after hearing submissions and reviewing skeleton arguments, that there was no merit in granting any of the applications.

Court Disposition

Applications dismissed

Orders

  • Application for permission to appeal refused
  • Application for extension of time refused