Byatt v Browne [2001] EWCA Civ 2070 (17 December 2001)
The Chancery Division judge had no jurisdiction to set aside orders already affirmed on appeal to the High Court; there was no prospect of success in a further appeal, and refusal to adjourn was justified as the application was bound to fail.
- Citation
- [2001] EWCA Civ 2070
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Peter George Byatt; Defendant/appellant: Alfred Browne
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 December 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal to the Court of Appeal From a Chancery Division Order
- Outcome
- Application for permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Appeals, Jurisdiction, Adjournment, Bankruptcy Property, Transfer at Undervalue
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter George Byatt
Claimant/respondent
Alfred Browne
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal to the Court of Appeal From a Chancery Division Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Chancery Division judge had jurisdiction to set aside orders already appealed to the High Court
- 2 Whether refusal to adjourn for legal representation was proper
- 3 Whether there was any prospect of success in a further appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The Chancery Division judge had no jurisdiction to set aside orders already affirmed on appeal to the High Court; there was no prospect of success in a further appeal, and refusal to adjourn was justified as the application was bound to fail.
Court Disposition
Application for permission to appeal refused
Orders
- No order for costs
- Transcript to be supplied to the applicants at public expense
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment