Heath Giles & Co (A Firm) v Thorogood & Anor [2001] EWCA Civ 1914 (7 December 2001)
Section 54(4) of the Access to Justice Act 1999 expressly prohibits an appeal against a refusal of permission to appeal by a lower court, leaving the appellate court with no discretion to grant permission.
- Citation
- [2001] EWCA Civ 1914
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Heath Giles & Co (a firm); Defendant/applicant: Edith Rose Thorogood; Defendant/applicant: Robert Arthur William Thorogood
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 December 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for permission to appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Appeals, Permission to Appeal, Charging Orders, Access to Justice Act 1999
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Heath Giles & Co (a firm)
Claimant/respondent
Edith Rose Thorogood
Defendant/applicant
Robert Arthur William Thorogood
Defendant/applicant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether permission to appeal can be granted against a refusal of permission to appeal by a county court judge under section 54(4) of the Access to Justice Act 1999
Ratio Decidendi
Section 54(4) of the Access to Justice Act 1999 expressly prohibits an appeal against a refusal of permission to appeal by a lower court, leaving the appellate court with no discretion to grant permission.
Court Disposition
Application for permission to appeal dismissed
Orders
- Application for permission to appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment