Sharma v Sunrise Radio Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 213 (4 February 2002)
The application for permission to appeal was dismissed because the proposed appeal did not raise any important point of principle or practice, nor was there any compelling reason for the Court of Appeal to hear it. The grounds advanced by Mr Sharma were found to be without substance.
- Citation
- [2002] EWCA Civ 213
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Anil Sharma; Defendant/appellant: Sunrise Radio Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 February 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal to Court of Appeal (second Tier Appeal)
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Appeals, Costs, Summary Assessment of Costs, Permission to Appeal, Litigants in Person
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anil Sharma
Claimant/respondent
Sunrise Radio Limited
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal to Court of Appeal (second Tier Appeal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether permission should be granted for a second-tier appeal under CPR 52.13
- 2 Whether there was an error in the summary assessment of costs
- 3 Whether refusal to adjourn hearing due to late service of skeleton argument was improper
Ratio Decidendi
The application for permission to appeal was dismissed because the proposed appeal did not raise any important point of principle or practice, nor was there any compelling reason for the Court of Appeal to hear it. The grounds advanced by Mr Sharma were found to be without substance.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- No order for costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment