Sharma v Sunrise Radio Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 213 (4 February 2002)

Sharma v Sunrise Radio Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 213 (4 February 2002)

The application for permission to appeal was dismissed because the proposed appeal did not raise any important point of principle or practice, nor was there any compelling reason for the Court of Appeal to hear it. The grounds advanced by Mr Sharma were found to be without substance.

Citation
[2002] EWCA Civ 213
Parties
Claimant/respondent: Anil Sharma; Defendant/appellant: Sunrise Radio Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
04 February 2002
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal to Court of Appeal (second Tier Appeal)
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Appeals, Costs, Summary Assessment of Costs, Permission to Appeal, Litigants in Person

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Anil Sharma

Claimant/respondent

Sunrise Radio Limited

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal to Court of Appeal (second Tier Appeal)

  1. 1 Whether permission should be granted for a second-tier appeal under CPR 52.13
  2. 2 Whether there was an error in the summary assessment of costs
  3. 3 Whether refusal to adjourn hearing due to late service of skeleton argument was improper

Ratio Decidendi

The application for permission to appeal was dismissed because the proposed appeal did not raise any important point of principle or practice, nor was there any compelling reason for the Court of Appeal to hear it. The grounds advanced by Mr Sharma were found to be without substance.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • No order for costs