Major v Lamyman
The appellate judge erred by intervening without identifying that the trial judge's decision was wrong or unjust due to procedural or other irregularity. The trial judge gave adequate reasons, and the medical evidence was properly considered. The original dismissal of the claim should be restored.
- Parties
- Respondent/claimant: Paul Andrew Major; Appellant/defendant: Peter Ernest Leonard Lamyman
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 November 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Second Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; trial judge's dismissal of claim restored
- Legal Topics
- Appeals, Judicial Reasoning, Workplace Accident, Evidence Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Paul Andrew Major
Respondent/claimant
Peter Ernest Leonard Lamyman
Appellant/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Second Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the first appellate judge applied the correct principles in allowing the appeal and ordering a retrial on liability
- 2 Whether the trial judge gave adequate reasons for his decision to dismiss the claim
- 3 Whether the medical evidence was properly considered in relation to the claimant's account of the accident
Ratio Decidendi
The appellate judge erred by intervening without identifying that the trial judge's decision was wrong or unjust due to procedural or other irregularity. The trial judge gave adequate reasons, and the medical evidence was properly considered. The original dismissal of the claim should be restored.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; trial judge's dismissal of claim restored
Orders
- Application for permission to appeal granted
- Appeal allowed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment