MYLES HANTLER v CLAIRE HIBBERT
Permission to appeal on ground 2 (quantum of loss) is refused as it would amount to a re-hearing of factual findings, which is not the function of an appeal. Permission to appeal on ground 4 (compound interest) is granted as there is a real prospect the judge erred by awarding compound interest without a pleaded case or supporting evidence.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Myles Hantler; Defendant/appellant: Claire Hibbert; Defendant/appellant: Stuart Hibbert
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 February 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal refused on ground 2; granted on ground 4.
- Legal Topics
- Appeals, Quantum of Loss, Interest on Judgments
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Myles Hantler
Claimant/respondent
Claire Hibbert
Defendant/appellant
Stuart Hibbert
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge made an arithmetical error in computing quantum of loss
- 2 Whether the award of compound interest at 5% per annum was justified without a pleaded case or evidence
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to appeal on ground 2 (quantum of loss) is refused as it would amount to a re-hearing of factual findings, which is not the function of an appeal. Permission to appeal on ground 4 (compound interest) is granted as there is a real prospect the judge erred by awarding compound interest without a pleaded case or supporting evidence.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal refused on ground 2; granted on ground 4.
Orders
- Permission to appeal on ground 2 refused.
- Permission to appeal on ground 4 granted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment