Samcrete Egypt Engineers and Contractors S.a.e. v Land Rover Exports Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 2019 (21st December, 2001)
The presumption in Article 4(2) of the Rome Convention that the law of the country of the party effecting the characteristic performance governs the contract can be displaced where the circumstances as a whole demonstrate a closer connection with another country. In this case, the guarantee's centre of gravity was...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2001] EWCA Civ 2019
- Parties
- Defendant/appellant: Samcrete Egypt Engineers and Contractors S.A.E.; Claimant/respondent: Land Rover Exports Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Birmingham Mercantile Court Decision on Application for Stay of Proceedings
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Applicable Law in Absence of Choice, Rome Convention Article 4, Forum Non Conveniens, Contracts of Guarantee
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Samcrete Egypt Engineers and Contractors S.A.E.
Defendant/appellant
Land Rover Exports Limited
Claimant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Birmingham Mercantile Court Decision on Application for Stay of Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the applicable law governing a contract of guarantee where no express choice of law is made and the underlying contract contains a choice of law clause?
- 2 What is the correct approach to the presumption in Article 4(2) of the Rome Convention in such circumstances?
- 3 Should the proceedings be stayed on the ground of forum non conveniens?
Ratio Decidendi
The presumption in Article 4(2) of the Rome Convention that the law of the country of the party effecting the characteristic performance governs the contract can be displaced where the circumstances as a whole demonstrate a closer connection with another country. In this case, the guarantee's centre of gravity was in England due to the place of payment, the currency, and the connection to the underlying contract governed by English law. Therefore, English law applies to the guarantee, and the application for a stay was rightly dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Respondent to pay half Appellant's costs
- Costs summarily assessed but final sum to be agreed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment