Blights Builders Ltd, Re [2006] EWHC 3549 (Ch) (02 October 2006)
The appointment of joint administrators by the company's members was invalid because a winding up petition had already been presented and not disposed of, depriving the company of power to appoint administrators under paragraph 22 of Schedule B1. The invalidity could not be remedied under Insolvency Rule 7.55. However, the acts of the administrators are to be treated as valid under paragraph 104 of Schedule B1, and an administration order is appropriate given the company's insolvency and the likelihood of a better outcome for creditors.
- Citation
- [2006] EWHC 3549 (Ch)
- Parties
- Petitioner/creditor: Jewson Limited; Respondent/company: Blights Builders Limited; Proposed Joint Administrator: Mr O'Sullivan; Proposed Joint Administrator: Mr Tailby; Shareholder/executors: Mr Blight's executors
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 October 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Insolvency (administration and Winding Up) / Hearing of Applications Regarding Validity of Administrator Appointment and for Administration Order
- Outcome
- Appointment of Mr O'Sullivan and Mr Tailby as administrators declared invalid; acts as administrators declared valid; indemnity granted for actions taken; administration order made; winding up petition dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Appointment of Administrators, Winding Up Petitions, Validity of Insolvency Proceedings, Administration Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jewson Limited
Petitioner/creditor
Blights Builders Limited
Respondent/company
Mr O'Sullivan
Proposed Joint Administrator
Mr Tailby
Proposed Joint Administrator
Mr Blight's executors
Shareholder/executors
Procedural Posture
Insolvency (administration and Winding Up) / Hearing of Applications Regarding Validity of Administrator Appointment and for Administration Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appointment of joint administrators was valid in light of an undisposed winding up petition
- 2 Whether the invalidity of the appointment could be remedied under Insolvency Rule 7.55
- 3 Whether a creditor may apply for an administration order in place of a winding up order
Ratio Decidendi
The appointment of joint administrators by the company's members was invalid because a winding up petition had already been presented and not disposed of, depriving the company of power to appoint administrators under paragraph 22 of Schedule B1. The invalidity could not be remedied under Insolvency Rule 7.55. However, the acts of the administrators are to be treated as valid under paragraph 104 of Schedule B1, and an administration order is appropriate given the company's insolvency and the likelihood of a better outcome for creditors.
Court Disposition
Appointment of Mr O'Sullivan and Mr Tailby as administrators declared invalid; acts as administrators declared valid; indemnity granted for actions taken; administration order made; winding up petition dismissed.
Orders
- Declaration that appointment of Mr O'Sullivan and Mr Tailby as joint administrators was invalid.
- Indemnity in respect of actions taken by them whilst acting as administrators under the invalid appointment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment