Sophie Rebecca Perhar v Louise Freestone & Ors

Sophie Rebecca Perhar v Louise Freestone & Ors

The factual issues relating to breach of trust, waiver, and the implication of terms into the debenture were unsuitable for summary determination and must be decided at trial. The defects in the appointment process did not cause substantial injustice and do not invalidate the appointment of administrators.

Parties
Claimant/appellant: Sophie Rebecca Perhar; Defendant/respondent: Louise Freestone; Defendant/respondent: Paul Mallatratt; Defendant/respondent: Synergy in Trade Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
25 April 2024
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part, dismissed in part
Legal Topics
Appointment of Administrators, Implied Terms in Debenture, Waiver and Estoppel, Defective Appointment Process
Insolvency Law Contract Law Appointment of Administrators Implied Terms in Debenture Waiver and Estoppel Defective Appointment Process

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sophie Rebecca Perhar

Claimant/appellant

Louise Freestone

Defendant/respondent

Paul Mallatratt

Defendant/respondent

Synergy in Trade Limited

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the floating charge under which administrators were appointed was enforceable at the date of appointment
  2. 2 Whether the notice of appointment filed by Synergy was defective and incapable of cure
  3. 3 Whether the court made findings of fact akin to fraud and dishonesty without hearing evidence

Ratio Decidendi

The factual issues relating to breach of trust, waiver, and the implication of terms into the debenture were unsuitable for summary determination and must be decided at trial. The defects in the appointment process did not cause substantial injustice and do not invalidate the appointment of administrators.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part, dismissed in part

Orders

  • Appeal allowed on grounds 1 to 3; issues to be determined at trial
  • Appeal dismissed on ground 4; Judge's findings on appointment process stand