Hinduja v Hinduja & Ors [2020] EWHC 1533 (Ch) (23 June 2020)

Hinduja v Hinduja & Ors [2020] EWHC 1533 (Ch) (23 June 2020)

Vinoo Hinduja is appointed as litigation friend for Srichand Parmanand Hinduja under CPR 21.6 because the court is satisfied, on the evidence, that Srichand lacks capacity to conduct proceedings and that Vinoo meets the requirements of CPR 21.4(3). Steps taken before her appointment are regularised under CPR 21.3(4). The application for a permanent privacy order restricting access to court documents is refused as it constitutes an unjustified derogation from the open justice principle.

Citation
[2020] EWHC 1533 (Ch)
Parties
Claimant: Srichand Parmanand Hinduja; Litigation Friend for Claimant: Vinoo Hinduja; First Defendant: Gopichand Parmanand Hinduja; Second Defendant: Prakash Parmanand Hinduja; Third Defendant: Ashok Parmanand Hinduja
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
23 June 2020
Procedural Posture
Part 8 Claim (chancery Division) / Interlocutory Applications: Appointment of Litigation Friend and Privacy Order
Outcome
Regularisation application granted; privacy application refused.
Legal Topics
Appointment of Litigation Friend, Protected Party Status, Open Justice Principle, Privacy in Court Proceedings, Capacity to Conduct Litigation
Civil Procedure Trusts and Probate Mental Capacity Appointment of Litigation Friend Protected Party Status Open Justice Principle Privacy in Court Proceedings Capacity to Conduct Litigation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Srichand Parmanand Hinduja

Claimant

Vinoo Hinduja

Litigation Friend for Claimant

Gopichand Parmanand Hinduja

First Defendant

Prakash Parmanand Hinduja

Second Defendant

Ashok Parmanand Hinduja

Third Defendant

Procedural Posture

Part 8 Claim (chancery Division) / Interlocutory Applications: Appointment of Litigation Friend and Privacy Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Vinoo Hinduja should be appointed as litigation friend for Srichand Parmanand Hinduja under CPR 21.6
  2. 2 Whether steps taken before appointment should be regularised under CPR 21.3(4)
  3. 3 Whether a permanent privacy order restricting access to court documents should be granted

Ratio Decidendi

Vinoo Hinduja is appointed as litigation friend for Srichand Parmanand Hinduja under CPR 21.6 because the court is satisfied, on the evidence, that Srichand lacks capacity to conduct proceedings and that Vinoo meets the requirements of CPR 21.4(3). Steps taken before her appointment are regularised under CPR 21.3(4). The application for a permanent privacy order restricting access to court documents is refused as it constitutes an unjustified derogation from the open justice principle.

Court Disposition

Regularisation application granted; privacy application refused.

Orders

  • Vinoo Hinduja appointed as litigation friend for Srichand Parmanand Hinduja under CPR 21.6.
  • All steps taken in the proceedings before the appointment are regularised under CPR 21.3(4).