Nicholson v HSBC Bank Plc & Anor [2001] EWCA Civ 748 (11 May, 2001)

Nicholson v HSBC Bank Plc & Anor [2001] EWCA Civ 748 (11 May, 2001)

The judge found, based on the evidence and witness credibility, that the bank acted in its own interests and not in bad faith; the overdraft was contractually repayable on demand, and no breach of contract or confidence occurred; the applicant received a fair trial and there was no realistic prospect of success on appeal.

Citation
[2001] EWCA Civ 748
Parties
Claimant/applicant: John Dixon Brearey Nicholson; Defendant/respondent: HSBC Bank plc; Defendant/respondent: BOCM Pauls Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
Outcome
Application for permission to appeal refused with costs
Legal Topics
Appointment of Receiver, Bad Faith, Breach of Contract, Breach of Confidence, Human Rights, Overdraft Repayable on Demand
Banking Law Contract Law Civil Procedure Appointment of Receiver Bad Faith Breach of Contract Breach of Confidence Human Rights +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Dixon Brearey Nicholson

Claimant/applicant

HSBC Bank plc

Defendant/respondent

BOCM Pauls Limited

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the bank acted in bad faith in appointing a receiver
  2. 2 Whether there was a breach of contract regarding the timing of the demand and appointment of receiver
  3. 3 Whether there was a breach of confidence in information sharing between creditors

Ratio Decidendi

The judge found, based on the evidence and witness credibility, that the bank acted in its own interests and not in bad faith; the overdraft was contractually repayable on demand, and no breach of contract or confidence occurred; the applicant received a fair trial and there was no realistic prospect of success on appeal.

Court Disposition

Application for permission to appeal refused with costs

Orders

  • Permission to appeal refused
  • Applicant to pay costs