Tracs (Engineering) Ltd v Sampson & Ors [2001] EWCA Civ 1388 (26th July 2001)
Appointment of a receiver was inappropriate and disproportionate given the effectiveness of existing freezing orders and financial monitoring, the limited profit at stake, and the risk of disrupting contract performance; interim remedies short of receivership were sufficient to protect claimant's interests.
- Citation
- [2001] EWCA Civ 1388
- Parties
- Respondent/claimant: TRACS (Engineering) Ltd; Applicant/defendant: Sampson & Ors
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Order Appointing Receiver
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; order appointing receiver discharged; monitoring provisions continued.
- Legal Topics
- Appointment of Receiver, Freezing Injunction, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Interim Remedies
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
TRACS (Engineering) Ltd
Respondent/claimant
Sampson & Ors
Applicant/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Order Appointing Receiver
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether appointment of a receiver over PWME Ltd was just and convenient under section 37 of the Supreme Court Act 1981
- 2 Whether interim remedies short of receivership were sufficient to protect claimant's interests
Ratio Decidendi
Appointment of a receiver was inappropriate and disproportionate given the effectiveness of existing freezing orders and financial monitoring, the limited profit at stake, and the risk of disrupting contract performance; interim remedies short of receivership were sufficient to protect claimant's interests.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; order appointing receiver discharged; monitoring provisions continued.
Orders
- Application for permission to appeal granted.
- Appeal allowed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment