Furmedge & Ors v Chester -Le -Street District Council [2011] EWHC 1226 (QB) (16 May 2011)
Both Chester-le-Street District Council and Brouhaha International Limited failed to ensure that adequate risk assessments and structural safety measures were in place for the Dreamspace V installation. The Council, as the local authority and event host, and BIL, as an organiser with operational involvement, each bore responsibility for the failure to address foreseeable risks. Liability for compensation paid to victims is to be apportioned between the Council and BIL according to their respective degrees of fault and involvement.
- Citation
- [2011] EWHC 1226
- Parties
- Claimant: Gary Furmedge (Administrator of the Estate of Claire Furmedge deceased); Claimant: William Collings (Administrator of the Estate of Elizabeth Collings deceased); Claimant: Susan Campbell; Defendant and Part 20 Claimant: Chester-le-Street District Council; First Named Third Party: Brouhaha International Limited; Second Named Third Party: Maurice Agis
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 May 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Contribution/apportionment of Liability / Judgment After Trial on Apportionment of Responsibility
- Outcome
- Liability apportioned between Chester-le-Street District Council and Brouhaha International Limited for compensation paid to victims of the Dreamspace V incident.
- Legal Topics
- Apportionment of Liability, Negligence, Duty of Care, Contribution Between Tortfeasors, Public Liability, Risk Assessment, Event Safety
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gary Furmedge (Administrator of the Estate of Claire Furmedge deceased)
Claimant
William Collings (Administrator of the Estate of Elizabeth Collings deceased)
Claimant
Susan Campbell
Claimant
Chester-le-Street District Council
Defendant and Part 20 Claimant
Brouhaha International Limited
First Named Third Party
Maurice Agis
Second Named Third Party
Procedural Posture
Civil Contribution/apportionment of Liability / Judgment After Trial on Apportionment of Responsibility
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Chester-le-Street District Council and/or Brouhaha International Limited are liable for the injuries and deaths caused by the Dreamspace V incident
- 2 The extent to which each party should bear responsibility for compensation paid to victims
Ratio Decidendi
Both Chester-le-Street District Council and Brouhaha International Limited failed to ensure that adequate risk assessments and structural safety measures were in place for the Dreamspace V installation. The Council, as the local authority and event host, and BIL, as an organiser with operational involvement, each bore responsibility for the failure to address foreseeable risks. Liability for compensation paid to victims is to be apportioned between the Council and BIL according to their respective degrees of fault and involvement.
Court Disposition
Liability apportioned between Chester-le-Street District Council and Brouhaha International Limited for compensation paid to victims of the Dreamspace V incident.
Orders
- Each party to bear a share of the compensation liability according to the court's apportionment of responsibility.
- No compensation claims by victims remain outstanding in this trial; the judgment concerns only apportionment between the Council and BIL.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment