Hart District Council, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government & Ors [2008] EWHC 1204 (Admin) (01 May 2008)
The court held that the Secretary of State erred in law by granting planning permission without undertaking an appropriate assessment under Article 6(3) of the Habitats Directive and Regulation 48. The Secretary of State was not entitled to conclude, in the absence of objective evidence, that the provision of SANGS would avoid any likely significant effect on the SPA. The Secretary of State failed to consider material considerations, including the Inspector's findings and the Technical Assessor's report, and gave determinative weight to Natural England's advice without independent evaluation. The decision was therefore quashed.
- Citation
- [2008] EWHC 1204 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Hart District Council; First Defendant: Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government; Second Defendant: Luckmore Limited; Third Defendant: Barratt Homes Limited; First Interested Party: Taylor Wimpey Developments Limited; Second Interested Party: Natural England
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 May 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review (section 288 Town and Country Planning Act 1990) / High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim allowed; decision quashed
- Legal Topics
- Appropriate Assessment, Habitats Directive, Special Protection Areas, Mitigation Measures, Judicial Review, Planning Permission
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hart District Council
Claimant
Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
First Defendant
Luckmore Limited
Second Defendant
Barratt Homes Limited
Third Defendant
Taylor Wimpey Developments Limited
First Interested Party
Natural England
Second Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review (section 288 Town and Country Planning Act 1990) / High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Secretary of State erred in law by granting planning permission without undertaking an appropriate assessment under Article 6(3) of the Habitats Directive and Regulation 48 of the Conservation (Natural Habitats, &c.) Regulations 1994
- 2 Whether the provision of Suitable Alternative Natural Greenspace (SANGS) lawfully avoids the need for appropriate assessment
- 3 Whether the Secretary of State failed to consider material considerations, including the Inspector's findings and new evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the Secretary of State erred in law by granting planning permission without undertaking an appropriate assessment under Article 6(3) of the Habitats Directive and Regulation 48. The Secretary of State was not entitled to conclude, in the absence of objective evidence, that the provision of SANGS would avoid any likely significant effect on the SPA. The Secretary of State failed to consider material considerations, including the Inspector's findings and the Technical Assessor's report, and gave determinative weight to Natural England's advice without independent evaluation. The decision was therefore quashed.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed; decision quashed
Orders
- The decision of the Secretary of State dated 24 July 2007 granting planning permission is quashed.
- The matter is remitted for reconsideration in accordance with the law.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment