Gladman Developments Ltd v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities And Local Government & Anor [2019] EWHC 2001 (Admin) (24 July 2019)
The Secretary of State lawfully applied paragraph 177 of the 2018 NPPF in refusing to apply the presumption in favour of sustainable development ('tilted balance') where Appropriate Assessment was required, regardless of its outcome. The policy was clear, in force, and not yet amended at the time of decision. There was no legal obligation to consult further on the Technical Consultation or new evidence, and the reasons given were legally adequate. The challenge to the application of People Over Wind was rejected as it was binding law.
- Citation
- [2019] EWHC 2001 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Gladman Developments Limited; 1st Defendant: Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government; 2nd Defendant: Medway Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 July 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review (section 288 TCPA 1990) / High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Appropriate Assessment, Habitats Directive, National Planning Policy Framework, Five Year Housing Land Supply, Judicial Review, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gladman Developments Limited
Claimant
Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government
1st Defendant
Medway Council
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review (section 288 TCPA 1990) / High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Secretary of State lawfully applied paragraph 177 of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) in refusing planning permission after Appropriate Assessment
- 2 Whether failure to consult on the Technical Consultation or new evidence breached procedural fairness
- 3 Whether the Secretary of State failed to provide adequate reasons for his decision
Ratio Decidendi
The Secretary of State lawfully applied paragraph 177 of the 2018 NPPF in refusing to apply the presumption in favour of sustainable development ('tilted balance') where Appropriate Assessment was required, regardless of its outcome. The policy was clear, in force, and not yet amended at the time of decision. There was no legal obligation to consult further on the Technical Consultation or new evidence, and the reasons given were legally adequate. The challenge to the application of People Over Wind was rejected as it was binding law.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- The claim under section 288 TCPA 1990 is dismissed.
- No order for quashing the Secretary of State's decision.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment