United Tyre Company Ltd v Born [2004] EWCA Civ 1236 (16 July 2004)
Unreasonable delay in bringing an application under Section 28(3) of the Arbitration Act 1996 does not automatically bar relief; the court must consider all circumstances, including prejudice and notice given, and may allow the application if it is reasonable to do so despite delay.
- Citation
- [2004] EWCA Civ 1236
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: United Tyre Company Ltd; Defendant/appellant: Graham I Born
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 July 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Arbitrator's Fees, Delay in Bringing Claims, Section 28 Arbitration Act 1996, Discretion to Refuse Relief for Delay
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
United Tyre Company Ltd
Claimant/respondent
Graham I Born
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether unreasonable delay in bringing an application under Section 28(3) of the Arbitration Act 1996 bars relief to challenge arbitrator's fees
- 2 Whether absence of prejudice to the arbitrator affects the court's discretion to allow the application despite delay
Ratio Decidendi
Unreasonable delay in bringing an application under Section 28(3) of the Arbitration Act 1996 does not automatically bar relief; the court must consider all circumstances, including prejudice and notice given, and may allow the application if it is reasonable to do so despite delay.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Renewed application for permission to appeal refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment