Sahib Foods Ltd v Paskin Kyriakides Sands (a firm) [2003] EWCA Civ 1832 (19 December 2003)

Sahib Foods Ltd v Paskin Kyriakides Sands (a firm) [2003] EWCA Civ 1832 (19 December 2003)

PKS were negligent in failing to ascertain the true nature of cooking operations in the veg prep room and to specify fire-resistant panels, which would have prevented the spread of the fire. Sahib Foods, through its employee, was also at fault for providing inaccurate information about the use of the room, which contributed to the use of inappropriate panels. Both parties' faults contributed to the loss, justifying apportionment of damages for contributory negligence.

Citation
[2003] EWCA Civ 1832
Parties
Claimant/respondent: Sahib Foods Limited (In Liquidation); Defendants/appellants: Paskin Kyriakides Sands (A Firm)
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
19 December 2003
Procedural Posture
Appeal (civil) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Liability and Contributory Negligence
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part; PKS found liable but finding of no contributory negligence overturned.
Legal Topics
Architects' Duty of Care, Contributory Negligence, Causation, Fire Damage Liability, Building Design Standards
Tort Law Contract Law Professional Negligence Construction Law Architects' Duty of Care Contributory Negligence Causation Fire Damage Liability +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sahib Foods Limited (In Liquidation)

Claimant/respondent

Paskin Kyriakides Sands (A Firm)

Defendants/appellants

Procedural Posture

Appeal (civil) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Liability and Contributory Negligence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether PKS were negligent in failing to specify fire-resistant panels for the veg prep room
  2. 2 Whether Sahib Foods was contributorily negligent in causing or allowing the spread of the fire
  3. 3 Whether damages should be apportioned under the Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945

Ratio Decidendi

PKS were negligent in failing to ascertain the true nature of cooking operations in the veg prep room and to specify fire-resistant panels, which would have prevented the spread of the fire. Sahib Foods, through its employee, was also at fault for providing inaccurate information about the use of the room, which contributed to the use of inappropriate panels. Both parties' faults contributed to the loss, justifying apportionment of damages for contributory negligence.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part; PKS found liable but finding of no contributory negligence overturned.

Orders

  • PKS held liable for breach of duty and contract for failure to specify fire-resistant panels.
  • Finding of no contributory negligence by Sahib Foods overturned; damages to be apportioned to reflect contributory negligence.