Barry Urquhart Associates (A Firm) v East Surrey Health Authority [2001] EWCA Civ 1465 (8 October 2001)
There is a real prospect that the claimants can establish the RIBA terms of engagement were incorporated into the contract, entitling them to fees for work performed, either by express agreement or by implication from the parties' conduct and correspondence.
- Citation
- [2001] EWCA Civ 1465
- Parties
- Claimant/applicant: Barry Urquhart Associates (A Firm); Defendant/respondent: East Surrey Health Authority
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 October 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Permission to Appeal Application
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal granted
- Legal Topics
- Architects' Fees, Contract Formation, Terms of Engagement, Implied Terms
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Barry Urquhart Associates (A Firm)
Claimant/applicant
East Surrey Health Authority
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Permission to Appeal Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the letter of 26 April 1990 constituted the entire agreement between the parties
- 2 Whether the RIBA terms of engagement formed part of the contract
- 3 Whether the claimants are entitled to fees under the contract
Ratio Decidendi
There is a real prospect that the claimants can establish the RIBA terms of engagement were incorporated into the contract, entitling them to fees for work performed, either by express agreement or by implication from the parties' conduct and correspondence.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal granted
Orders
- Application allowed
- Case to be listed for one day on the short warned list
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment