Green & Ors v The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2022] EWCA Civ 1686 (21 December 2022)
Regulation C9 of the Police Pensions Regulations 1987, which provides for cessation of survivor's pension on remarriage or cohabitation, does not impair the essence or substance of the right to marry under Article 12 ECHR. The provision is not arbitrary, disproportionate, or unjust, and is objectively justified...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] EWCA Civ 1686
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Sharon Green; Claimant/appellant: Jacqueline Andrea Jennings; Claimant/appellant: Paul Robert Sneller; Defendant/respondent: The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis; Interested Party/second Respondent: Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (judicial Review) / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Article 12 ECHR (right to Marry), Police Pensions Regulations, Compatibility With Human Rights Act 1998, Proportionality, Judicial Review
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sharon Green
Claimant/appellant
Jacqueline Andrea Jennings
Claimant/appellant
Paul Robert Sneller
Claimant/appellant
The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis
Defendant/respondent
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Interested Party/second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal (judicial Review) / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Regulation C9 of the Police Pensions Regulations 1987 is incompatible with Article 12 ECHR (right to marry) as scheduled to the Human Rights Act 1998
- 2 Whether the cessation of survivor's pension on remarriage or cohabitation impairs the essence of the right to marry
Ratio Decidendi
Regulation C9 of the Police Pensions Regulations 1987, which provides for cessation of survivor's pension on remarriage or cohabitation, does not impair the essence or substance of the right to marry under Article 12 ECHR. The provision is not arbitrary, disproportionate, or unjust, and is objectively justified within the context of a contributory pension scheme. The State's policy choices and the integrity of the scheme rules are within the margin of appreciation afforded to it. The appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- No declaration of incompatibility is made in respect of Regulation C9 and Article 12 ECHR.
- No order for reinstatement or backdating of survivor's pension payments.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment