Keyu & Ors v Secretary of State for Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs & Anor [2014] EWCA Civ 312 (19 March 2014)
The Court of Appeal held that, notwithstanding the ECtHR Grand Chamber's decision in Janowiec v Russia, it is bound by domestic authority (Re McKerr, Re McCaughey) which precludes the application of Article 2 ECHR procedural obligations to deaths occurring before the Human Rights Act came into force. Therefore, the Secretary of State is not under a legal obligation to establish a public inquiry into the Batang Kali deaths under Article 2 ECHR or customary international law, and the exercise of discretion was not unlawful.
- Citation
- [2014] EWCA Civ 312
- Parties
- Appellants: Keyu & Others; Respondents: Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs & Anr
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 March 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Appeal From Administrative Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Article 2 ECHR Procedural Obligation, Customary International Law, State Responsibility, Public Inquiry, Temporal Scope of ECHR
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Keyu & Others
Appellants
Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs & Anr
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal From Administrative Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Secretary of State is under a legal obligation to establish an independent and effective investigation under Article 2 ECHR
- 2 Whether a comparable obligation arises under customary international law enforceable at common law
- 3 Whether the exercise of discretion not to establish a public inquiry is vitiated on domestic public law grounds
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal held that, notwithstanding the ECtHR Grand Chamber's decision in Janowiec v Russia, it is bound by domestic authority (Re McKerr, Re McCaughey) which precludes the application of Article 2 ECHR procedural obligations to deaths occurring before the Human Rights Act came into force. Therefore, the Secretary of State is not under a legal obligation to establish a public inquiry into the Batang Kali deaths under Article 2 ECHR or customary international law, and the exercise of discretion was not unlawful.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- No obligation to establish a public inquiry
- No order for compensation
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment