NM, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Justice [2012] EWCA Civ 1182 (12 September 2012)

NM, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Justice [2012] EWCA Civ 1182 (12 September 2012)

The prison's investigation was proportionate to the seriousness and circumstances of the incident; no breach of Article 3 investigative obligation occurred, as there was no state complicity, no systemic failure, and sufficient remedies were available; formal investigation under PSO 1300 was not required.

Citation
[2012] EWCA Civ 1182
Parties
Appellant / Claimant: R (NM); Respondent / Defendant: Secretary of State for Justice
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
12 September 2012
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Article 3 ECHR Investigative Obligation, Prison Service Orders, Disability Discrimination, Procedural Breach, Vulnerable Prisoners

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 18 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

R (NM)

Appellant / Claimant

Secretary of State for Justice

Respondent / Defendant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division)

  1. 1 Whether the prison's investigation into a sexual assault on a vulnerable prisoner complied with Article 3 ECHR investigative obligations
  2. 2 Whether a formal investigation under PSO 1300 was required
  3. 3 Whether effective participation was ensured for a disabled prisoner

Ratio Decidendi

The prison's investigation was proportionate to the seriousness and circumstances of the incident; no breach of Article 3 investigative obligation occurred, as there was no state complicity, no systemic failure, and sufficient remedies were available; formal investigation under PSO 1300 was not required.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • No breach of Article 3 investigative obligation found
  • No order for formal investigation under PSO 1300