NM, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Justice [2012] EWCA Civ 1182 (12 September 2012)
The prison's investigation was proportionate to the seriousness and circumstances of the incident; no breach of Article 3 investigative obligation occurred, as there was no state complicity, no systemic failure, and sufficient remedies were available; formal investigation under PSO 1300 was not required.
- Citation
- [2012] EWCA Civ 1182
- Parties
- Appellant / Claimant: R (NM); Respondent / Defendant: Secretary of State for Justice
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 September 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Article 3 ECHR Investigative Obligation, Prison Service Orders, Disability Discrimination, Procedural Breach, Vulnerable Prisoners
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
R (NM)
Appellant / Claimant
Secretary of State for Justice
Respondent / Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prison's investigation into a sexual assault on a vulnerable prisoner complied with Article 3 ECHR investigative obligations
- 2 Whether a formal investigation under PSO 1300 was required
- 3 Whether effective participation was ensured for a disabled prisoner
Ratio Decidendi
The prison's investigation was proportionate to the seriousness and circumstances of the incident; no breach of Article 3 investigative obligation occurred, as there was no state complicity, no systemic failure, and sufficient remedies were available; formal investigation under PSO 1300 was not required.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- No breach of Article 3 investigative obligation found
- No order for formal investigation under PSO 1300
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment