Nsubuga v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] EWCA Civ 1414 (02 November 2005)

The appeal should not proceed separately but be consolidated with related appeals to ensure consistent and efficient resolution of the core legal issue regarding the interaction of Articles 3 and 8 ECHR in deportation cases involving serious medical conditions.

Citation: [2005] EWCA Civ 1414
Parties: Applicant/appellant: Sarah Barigye Nsubuga; Respondent/respondent: Secretary of State for the Home Department
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Judgment Date: 02 November 2005
Procedural Posture: Appeal / Adjournment Pending Consolidation With Related Appeals
Outcome: Appeal adjourned; costs reserved
Legal Topics: Article 3 ECHR, Article 8 ECHR, Deportation and Medical Grounds, Consolidation of Appeals

Immigration Law Human Rights Law Article 3 ECHR Article 8 ECHR Deportation and Medical Grounds Consolidation of Appeals

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2

Parties

Sarah Barigye Nsubuga

Applicant/appellant

Secretary of State for the Home Department

Respondent/respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Adjournment Pending Consolidation With Related Appeals

Legal Issues

1 Interaction of Articles 3 and 8 ECHR in deportation cases involving HIV/AIDS
2 Appropriate approach to Article 8 claims post-N v Secretary of State for the Home Department

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Appeal adjourned; costs reserved

Orders

Appeal stood out of the list and to be listed with related appeals (Mando and/or KM)
Counsel to liaise for efficient case management