Grecu v Cornetu Court (Romania) & Ors [2017] EWHC 1427 (Admin) (20 June 2017)

Grecu v Cornetu Court (Romania) & Ors [2017] EWHC 1427 (Admin) (20 June 2017)

Extradition to Romania cannot proceed on current assurances, as the guaranteed minimum of 2m² personal space in semi-open prisons constitutes a long-term and normal provision, not a minor or occasional reduction, and thus breaches Article 3 ECHR under the cumulative test in Muršic v Croatia. The presumption of compliance by Romania is displaced by authoritative ECtHR findings of systemic violation and clear standards.

Citation
[2017] EWHC 1427 (Admin)
Parties
1st Appellant: Ionel-Remus Grecu; 1st Respondent: Cornetu Court (Romania); 2nd Appellant: Cosmin-Ionut Bagarea; 2nd Respondent: Caras Severin Tribunal Romania
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
20 June 2017
Procedural Posture
Extradition Appeal / Post Extradition Order, Appellate Review
Outcome
No final order; extradition suspended pending further undertakings from Respondents.
Legal Topics
Article 3 ECHR, Prison Conditions, Minimum Personal Space, International Assurances, Systemic Violation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ionel-Remus Grecu

1st Appellant

Cornetu Court (Romania)

1st Respondent

Cosmin-Ionut Bagarea

2nd Appellant

Caras Severin Tribunal Romania

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Extradition Appeal / Post Extradition Order, Appellate Review

  1. 1 Whether extradition to Romania breaches Article 3 ECHR due to prison conditions and insufficient personal space
  2. 2 Whether Romanian assurances regarding prison conditions are adequate under ECtHR jurisprudence

Ratio Decidendi

Extradition to Romania cannot proceed on current assurances, as the guaranteed minimum of 2m² personal space in semi-open prisons constitutes a long-term and normal provision, not a minor or occasional reduction, and thus breaches Article 3 ECHR under the cumulative test in Muršic v Croatia. The presumption of compliance by Romania is displaced by authoritative ECtHR findings of systemic violation and clear standards.

Court Disposition

No final order; extradition suspended pending further undertakings from Respondents.

Orders

  • Respondents granted up to four weeks from judgment date to provide revised undertakings guaranteeing minimum 3m² personal space for Appellants throughout detention.
  • Appellants may respond in writing within 14 days of Respondents' submissions.