Grecu v Cornetu Court (Romania) & Ors [2017] EWHC 1427 (Admin) (20 June 2017)
Extradition to Romania cannot proceed on current assurances, as the guaranteed minimum of 2m² personal space in semi-open prisons constitutes a long-term and normal provision, not a minor or occasional reduction, and thus breaches Article 3 ECHR under the cumulative test in Muršic v Croatia. The presumption of compliance by Romania is displaced by authoritative ECtHR findings of systemic violation and clear standards.
- Citation
- [2017] EWHC 1427 (Admin)
- Parties
- 1st Appellant: Ionel-Remus Grecu; 1st Respondent: Cornetu Court (Romania); 2nd Appellant: Cosmin-Ionut Bagarea; 2nd Respondent: Caras Severin Tribunal Romania
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 June 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Extradition Appeal / Post Extradition Order, Appellate Review
- Outcome
- No final order; extradition suspended pending further undertakings from Respondents.
- Legal Topics
- Article 3 ECHR, Prison Conditions, Minimum Personal Space, International Assurances, Systemic Violation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ionel-Remus Grecu
1st Appellant
Cornetu Court (Romania)
1st Respondent
Cosmin-Ionut Bagarea
2nd Appellant
Caras Severin Tribunal Romania
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Extradition Appeal / Post Extradition Order, Appellate Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether extradition to Romania breaches Article 3 ECHR due to prison conditions and insufficient personal space
- 2 Whether Romanian assurances regarding prison conditions are adequate under ECtHR jurisprudence
Ratio Decidendi
Extradition to Romania cannot proceed on current assurances, as the guaranteed minimum of 2m² personal space in semi-open prisons constitutes a long-term and normal provision, not a minor or occasional reduction, and thus breaches Article 3 ECHR under the cumulative test in Muršic v Croatia. The presumption of compliance by Romania is displaced by authoritative ECtHR findings of systemic violation and clear standards.
Court Disposition
No final order; extradition suspended pending further undertakings from Respondents.
Orders
- Respondents granted up to four weeks from judgment date to provide revised undertakings guaranteeing minimum 3m² personal space for Appellants throughout detention.
- Appellants may respond in writing within 14 days of Respondents' submissions.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment