Ashman, R (on the application of) v Parole Board & Anor
The claimant's rights under Article 5(4) ECHR were breached by his continued detention without timely assessment, warranting a declaration but not a mandatory order for an expedited hearing, as the prejudice to other prisoners outweighed the benefit to the claimant.
- Parties
- Claimant: Damien Stephen Ashman; First Defendant: The Parole Board; Second Defendant: The Secretary of State for Justice
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 October 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment
- Outcome
- Declaration granted; mandatory order refused; costs awarded to claimant.
- Legal Topics
- Article 5(4) ECHR, Parole Board Hearings, Detention Beyond Minimum Term, Declaratory Relief, Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Damien Stephen Ashman
Claimant
The Parole Board
First Defendant
The Secretary of State for Justice
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant's continued detention beyond the minimum term without timely Parole Board assessment breached Article 5(4) ECHR
- 2 Whether a mandatory order for an expedited Parole Board hearing should be granted
- 3 Appropriate relief and costs
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant's rights under Article 5(4) ECHR were breached by his continued detention without timely assessment, warranting a declaration but not a mandatory order for an expedited hearing, as the prejudice to other prisoners outweighed the benefit to the claimant.
Court Disposition
Declaration granted; mandatory order refused; costs awarded to claimant.
Orders
- Declaration that claimant's rights under Article 5(4) ECHR were breached.
- Claimant awarded costs of the proceedings, to be assessed on the standard basis.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment