LV, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Justice & Anor

LV, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Justice & Anor

The delays in the review process, though present, were not undue given the complexity of the Claimant's case and the need for clinical assessment; the statutory scheme and its application did not breach Article 5(4) ECHR.

Parties
Claimant: LV; First Defendant: Secretary of State for Justice; Second Defendant: The Parole Board
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
15 May 2014
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Article 5(4) ECHR, Speedy Judicial Review, Mental Health Act 1983, Indeterminate Sentences, Conditional Discharge, Parole Board Procedure
Constitutional Law Human Rights Law Mental Health Law Criminal Law Article 5(4) ECHR Speedy Judicial Review Mental Health Act 1983 Indeterminate Sentences +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

LV

Claimant

Secretary of State for Justice

First Defendant

The Parole Board

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the delay in reviewing the Claimant's detention breached Article 5(4) ECHR
  2. 2 Whether the two-stage Tribunal and Parole Board process is compatible with Article 5(4)
  3. 3 Whether unexplained delays constituted a violation of the Claimant's rights

Ratio Decidendi

The delays in the review process, though present, were not undue given the complexity of the Claimant's case and the need for clinical assessment; the statutory scheme and its application did not breach Article 5(4) ECHR.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed