Hussain v Secretary Of State For Home Department [2004] EWCA Civ 1190 (30 July 2004)
The interference with family life caused by the applicant's removal is justified in pursuit of effective immigration control, and the temporary nature of the separation does not make the removal disproportionate under Article 8 ECHR.
- Citation
- [2004] EWCA Civ 1190
- Parties
- Applicant/respondent: Sheikh Saeed Hussain; Respondent/appellant: Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 July 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal to the Court of Appeal From the Immigration Appeal Tribunal
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Article 8 ECHR, Family Life, Immigration Control, Leave to Remain, Impact on Children
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sheikh Saeed Hussain
Applicant/respondent
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Respondent/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal to the Court of Appeal From the Immigration Appeal Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether removal of the applicant to Pakistan would breach Article 8 ECHR due to impact on family life
- 2 Whether the Immigration Appeal Tribunal erred in interfering with the Adjudicator's decision
- 3 Extent to which the impact on children and other family members must be considered
Ratio Decidendi
The interference with family life caused by the applicant's removal is justified in pursuit of effective immigration control, and the temporary nature of the separation does not make the removal disproportionate under Article 8 ECHR.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal refused
Orders
- Application for permission to appeal is refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment