D, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Home Department & Anor [2004] EWHC 2857 (Admin) (15 December 2004)

D, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Home Department & Anor [2004] EWHC 2857 (Admin) (15 December 2004)

The Defendants did not breach their duties under domestic law or the European Convention on Human Rights. The delay in the Claimant's transfer was due to the lack of available hospital places and inconsistent medical reports, not to any unreasonable conduct or breach by the Defendants. The Home Secretary and the National Assembly for Wales took all reasonable steps in the circumstances, and no infringement of the Claimant's Convention rights was established.

Citation
[2004] EWHC 2857 (Admin)
Parties
Claimant: D; First Defendant: The Secretary of State for the Home Department; Second Defendant: The National Assembly for Wales
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
15 December 2004
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment After Substantive Hearing
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Article 8 ECHR, Article 3 ECHR, Section 47 Mental Health Act 1983, Duty of Care to Prisoners, Commissioning of Mental Health Services, Delay in Transfer to Hospital, Breach of Convention Rights
Public Law Human Rights Law Mental Health Law Article 8 ECHR Article 3 ECHR Section 47 Mental Health Act 1983 Duty of Care to Prisoners Commissioning of Mental Health Services +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

D

Claimant

The Secretary of State for the Home Department

First Defendant

The National Assembly for Wales

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Final Judgment After Substantive Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Defendants unlawfully delayed the Claimant's transfer to hospital in breach of Article 8 ECHR
  2. 2 Whether the Defendants breached a duty of care under domestic law and the Mental Health Act 1983
  3. 3 Whether the National Assembly for Wales had a duty to secure or commission appropriate mental health services for the Claimant

Ratio Decidendi

The Defendants did not breach their duties under domestic law or the European Convention on Human Rights. The delay in the Claimant's transfer was due to the lack of available hospital places and inconsistent medical reports, not to any unreasonable conduct or breach by the Defendants. The Home Secretary and the National Assembly for Wales took all reasonable steps in the circumstances, and no infringement of the Claimant's Convention rights was established.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed