NF (Ghana) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 906 (30 July 2008)
The AIT erred by failing to have proper regard to the modified DP 5/96 policy, by not focusing sufficiently on the case of the child Obi, and by applying the wrong test of exceptionality to the Article 8 proportionality assessment. These errors require the decision to be set aside and the case remitted for reconsideration.
- Citation
- [2008] EWCA Civ 906
- Parties
- Appellant/claimant: NF (Ghana); Respondent/defendant: Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 July 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Asylum and Immigration Tribunal / Court of Appeal (civil Division)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; case remitted to the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal for reconsideration.
- Legal Topics
- Article 8 ECHR, Immigration Policy Discretion, Legitimate Expectation, Children's Rights, Deportation Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
NF (Ghana)
Appellant/claimant
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Asylum and Immigration Tribunal / Court of Appeal (civil Division)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the AIT gave proper consideration to the Secretary of State's DP 5/96 (7-year child concession) policy in the context of Article 8 ECHR
- 2 Whether the AIT properly focused on the position of the appellant's daughter, Obi, in the Article 8 and policy analysis
Ratio Decidendi
The AIT erred by failing to have proper regard to the modified DP 5/96 policy, by not focusing sufficiently on the case of the child Obi, and by applying the wrong test of exceptionality to the Article 8 proportionality assessment. These errors require the decision to be set aside and the case remitted for reconsideration.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; case remitted to the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal for reconsideration.
Orders
- Remission to the AIT for rehearing in light of the Court of Appeal's judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment