RJ (Gambia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] EWCA Civ 1406 (10 December 2015)
The First-tier Tribunal erred by treating the matter as an ordinary Article 8 proportionality exercise without focusing on the need for compelling reasons or exceptional circumstances outside the Immigration Rules.
- Citation
- [2015] EWCA Civ 1406
- Parties
- Claimant/applicant: RJ (Gambia); Defendant/respondent: Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 December 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Immigration Appeal Tribunal / Adjourned for Further Hearing
- Outcome
- Adjourned for further hearing
- Legal Topics
- Article 8 ECHR, Material Error of Law, Best Interests of Child, Exceptional Circumstances Outside Immigration Rules
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
RJ (Gambia)
Claimant/applicant
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Immigration Appeal Tribunal / Adjourned for Further Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was a material error of law in the First-tier Tribunal's decision
- 2 Proper approach to Article 8 proportionality outside the Immigration Rules
- 3 Consideration of compelling reasons or exceptional cases for leave to remain
Ratio Decidendi
The First-tier Tribunal erred by treating the matter as an ordinary Article 8 proportionality exercise without focusing on the need for compelling reasons or exceptional circumstances outside the Immigration Rules.
Court Disposition
Adjourned for further hearing
Orders
- Application adjourned for further hearing before Lord Justice Davis or another single Lord Justice.
- Secretary of State to file grounds of resistance by 4.30 pm on Wednesday 6th January 2016.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment