N v Secretary of State for the Home Department
The adjudicator did not apply the correct 'truly exceptional' test as required by Huang. The case must be remitted to the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal for reconsideration under the proper legal standard, with the British citizenship of the child being a relevant factor.
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: N; Defendant/respondent: Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 March 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Asylum and Immigration Tribunal to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; case remitted for reconsideration
- Legal Topics
- Article 8 ECHR, Removal of Non Citizen Parent, British Citizenship of Child, Exceptional Circumstances Test
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
N
Claimant/appellant
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Asylum and Immigration Tribunal to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether removal of the appellant would breach Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights
- 2 Whether the circumstances are 'truly exceptional' within the meaning of Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- 3 The relevance of the child's British citizenship to proportionality under Article 8
Ratio Decidendi
The adjudicator did not apply the correct 'truly exceptional' test as required by Huang. The case must be remitted to the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal for reconsideration under the proper legal standard, with the British citizenship of the child being a relevant factor.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; case remitted for reconsideration
Orders
- Remit the case to the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal for reconsideration by an immigration judge or judges under the correct legal test.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment