D, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Home Department & Anor

D, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Home Department & Anor

The delay in transferring the Claimant to hospital was not due to any breach by the Home Secretary or the National Assembly for Wales of their legal duties or the Claimant's Convention rights, but rather to difficulties in satisfying statutory requirements, lack of available places, and conflicting medical opinions. The Defendants took reasonable steps in the circumstances.

Parties
Claimant: D; First Defendant: The Secretary of State for the Home Department; Second Defendant: The National Assembly for Wales
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
15 December 2004
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment After Substantive Hearing
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Article 8 ECHR, Article 3 ECHR, Duty of Care to Prisoners, Transfer of Prisoners Under Mental Health Act, Commissioning of Mental Health Services, Judicial Review of Administrative Action

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

D

Claimant

The Secretary of State for the Home Department

First Defendant

The National Assembly for Wales

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Final Judgment After Substantive Hearing

  1. 1 Whether the Defendants unlawfully delayed the Claimant's transfer to hospital, infringing his Article 8 rights
  2. 2 Whether the Defendants breached a duty of care in failing to secure timely transfer and treatment
  3. 3 Whether the National Assembly for Wales had a duty to secure or commission appropriate mental health services for the Claimant

Ratio Decidendi

The delay in transferring the Claimant to hospital was not due to any breach by the Home Secretary or the National Assembly for Wales of their legal duties or the Claimant's Convention rights, but rather to difficulties in satisfying statutory requirements, lack of available places, and conflicting medical opinions. The Defendants took reasonable steps in the circumstances.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed