Ali & Anor R (on the application of) v Minister for the Cabinet Office the Statistics Board
Section 39(4)(f) of the Statistics and Registration Service Act 2007, when read together with the Data Protection Act 1998, the Human Rights Act 1998, and the Board’s published policy and operational procedures, provides a sufficiently clear, accessible, and predictable legal regime to satisfy the requirements of Article 8(2) ECHR. The Board’s policy to refuse disclosure except by court order, and the statutory safeguards and remedies, ensure that any interference with private life is proportionate and in accordance with the law. The challenge based on incompatibility with Directive 95/46 fails because the Directive does not apply to criminal law activities, and in any event, the DPA 1998...
- Parties
- First Claimant: Mohammed Ali; Second Claimant: SJ; First Defendant: Minister for the Cabinet Office; Second Defendant: The Statistics Board
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 July 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Article 8 ECHR, Data Protection Act 1998, Statistics and Registration Service Act 2007, Disclosure of Personal Data, Compatibility With EU Directive 95/46, Judicial Review of Statutory Provisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mohammed Ali
First Claimant
SJ
Second Claimant
Minister for the Cabinet Office
First Defendant
The Statistics Board
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether section 39(4)(f) of the Statistics and Registration Service Act 2007 is incompatible with Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights
- 2 Whether section 39(4)(f) is incompatible with EU Council Directive 95/46 (Data Protection Directive)
- 3 Whether the legal regime provides sufficient safeguards and clarity to satisfy the requirement of legality under Article 8(2) ECHR
Ratio Decidendi
Section 39(4)(f) of the Statistics and Registration Service Act 2007, when read together with the Data Protection Act 1998, the Human Rights Act 1998, and the Board’s published policy and operational procedures, provides a sufficiently clear, accessible, and predictable legal regime to satisfy the requirements of Article 8(2) ECHR. The Board’s policy to refuse disclosure except by court order, and the statutory safeguards and remedies, ensure that any interference with private life is proportionate and in accordance with the law. The challenge based on incompatibility with Directive 95/46 fails because the Directive does not apply to criminal law activities, and in any event, the DPA 1998...
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment