Qazi v London Borough Of Harrow Council [2001] EWCA Civ 1834 (3 December 2001)
A former tenant whose tenancy has ended by operation of law may still have a 'home' for the purposes of Article 8(1) ECHR if there are sufficient and continuous links to the property; legal or equitable interest is not a necessary condition. The making of a possession order engages Article 8(1).
- Citation
- [2001] EWCA Civ 1834
- Parties
- Defendant/appellant: Tarik Mahmood Qazi; Claimant/respondent: The Council of the London Borough of Harrow
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 December 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court (order for Possession and Related Sums)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; permission to appeal granted; case remitted to County Court to determine Article 8(2) issue.
- Legal Topics
- Article 8 ECHR – Right to Respect for Home, Termination of Joint Tenancy, Possession Proceedings, Interpretation of 'home' Under ECHR, Application of Human Rights Act 1998
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tarik Mahmood Qazi
Defendant/appellant
The Council of the London Borough of Harrow
Claimant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court (order for Possession and Related Sums)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a former tenant whose tenancy has ended by operation of law can claim a right to a 'home' under Article 8 ECHR
- 2 Whether actual residence without legal or equitable interest suffices for Article 8 protection
- 3 Whether the making of a possession order engages Article 8(1) ECHR
Ratio Decidendi
A former tenant whose tenancy has ended by operation of law may still have a 'home' for the purposes of Article 8(1) ECHR if there are sufficient and continuous links to the property; legal or equitable interest is not a necessary condition. The making of a possession order engages Article 8(1).
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; permission to appeal granted; case remitted to County Court to determine Article 8(2) issue.
Orders
- Costs of application, appeal, and court below to be paid by the Council to the applicant, stayed pending outcome of remitted hearing.
- Legal aid assessment of applicant's costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment