Pinnegar v Kellogg International Corporation & Anor [2020] EWHC 3431 (QB) (14 December 2020)
The court found, on the balance of probabilities, that Peter Skeen was exposed to asbestos dust during his employment at the Wilton site as a result of working in close proximity to laggers handling asbestos materials, and that this exposure was due to the defendants' breach of duty, materially increasing his risk...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] EWHC 3431 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Jacqueline Pinnegar (Executrix of the Estate of Peter Skeen, Deceased); First Defendant: Kellogg International Corporation; Second Defendant: ICI Chemicals & Polymers Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 December 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury / Fatal Accidents Claim / High Court Trial, Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the claimant
- Legal Topics
- Asbestos Exposure, Mesothelioma, Employer's Liability, Breach of Statutory Duty, Breach of Common Law Duty, Causation, Assessment of Witness Reliability
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jacqueline Pinnegar (Executrix of the Estate of Peter Skeen, Deceased)
Claimant
Kellogg International Corporation
First Defendant
ICI Chemicals & Polymers Limited
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury / Fatal Accidents Claim / High Court Trial, Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the deceased, Peter Skeen, was exposed to asbestos during his employment with the defendants at the Wilton site in 1966/67
- 2 Whether such exposure was caused by breach of statutory and/or common law duty by the defendants
- 3 Whether the exposure materially increased the risk of developing mesothelioma
Ratio Decidendi
The court found, on the balance of probabilities, that Peter Skeen was exposed to asbestos dust during his employment at the Wilton site as a result of working in close proximity to laggers handling asbestos materials, and that this exposure was due to the defendants' breach of duty, materially increasing his risk of developing mesothelioma. The claimant's evidence was accepted as broadly reliable and consistent with the documentary and expert evidence.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the claimant
Orders
- Defendants to pay the agreed sum of £180,000 in damages to the claimant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment