Kelly v South Yorkshire Police [2002] EWCA Civ 920 (12 June 2002)
The Court of Appeal held that its previous order allowing the jury's findings to stand was made intentionally and for good reasons, and the liberty to apply was not intended to permit reconsideration of matters that could have been raised earlier. The application to set aside the jury's verdicts on assault was dismissed.
- Citation
- [2002] EWCA Civ 920
- Parties
- Respondent/claimant: Patricia Kelly; Appellant/defendant: Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 June 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Post Judgment Application Following Appeal Decision
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Assault, False Imprisonment, Amendment of Pleadings, Jury Findings, Burden of Proof
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Patricia Kelly
Respondent/claimant
Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police
Appellant/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Post Judgment Application Following Appeal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court of Appeal should set aside the jury's verdicts on assault following permission to amend pleadings
- 2 Whether the legal burden of proof and reasonableness of force were properly left to the jury
- 3 Whether the court has jurisdiction to revisit its previous order allowing the jury's findings to stand
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal held that its previous order allowing the jury's findings to stand was made intentionally and for good reasons, and the liberty to apply was not intended to permit reconsideration of matters that could have been raised earlier. The application to set aside the jury's verdicts on assault was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Application dismissed with costs, subject to detailed assessment if the parties cannot agree an amount
- Payment of £3,000 on account of costs within 14 days
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment