Higgs v Camden & Islington Health Authority
The costs judge’s decision to allow hourly rates of £300 for the partner and £350 for leading counsel was not wrong, given the exceptional complexity and demands of the case; proper delegation was exercised, and the discretion of the costs judge should not be interfered with.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Leo Roland Higgs (a child suing by his mother and Litigation Friend, Marcia Higgs); Defendant/appellant: Camden & Islington Health Authority
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 January 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Costs Judge
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Assessment of Costs, Solicitor Hourly Rates, Delegation of Work, Counsel Fees
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Leo Roland Higgs (a child suing by his mother and Litigation Friend, Marcia Higgs)
Claimant/respondent
Camden & Islington Health Authority
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Costs Judge
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the hourly rate of £300 for the claimant’s solicitor was reasonable
- 2 Whether the degree of delegation by the partner was appropriate
- 3 Whether the hourly rate of £350 for leading counsel was justified
Ratio Decidendi
The costs judge’s decision to allow hourly rates of £300 for the partner and £350 for leading counsel was not wrong, given the exceptional complexity and demands of the case; proper delegation was exercised, and the discretion of the costs judge should not be interfered with.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed; the costs judge’s assessment stands.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment