Bayliss v Lunt [2002] EWCA Civ 716 (9 May 2002)
The judge made no error in principle in assessing future loss of earnings based on realistic, evidenced salary differentials and applying a substantial discount; nor was there any basis for deducting actual earnings during university years or for making a special costs order.
- Citation
- [2002] EWCA Civ 716
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Bayliss; Defendant/applicant: Lunt
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 May 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal From Judgment on Damages
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Assessment of Damages, Future Loss of Earnings, Costs Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bayliss
Claimant/respondent
Lunt
Defendant/applicant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal From Judgment on Damages
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judge erred in assessing future loss of earnings
- 2 Whether the judge erred in not deducting claimant's actual earnings during university years from damages
- 3 Whether the judge erred in making a normal costs order despite alleged procedural shortcomings
Ratio Decidendi
The judge made no error in principle in assessing future loss of earnings based on realistic, evidenced salary differentials and applying a substantial discount; nor was there any basis for deducting actual earnings during university years or for making a special costs order.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Permission to appeal refused
- Costs of and occasioned by this application to be paid by the defendant to the claimant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment