Rippon Patel And French LLP v Mowlam
The bill had not been fully paid for the purposes of section 70(4) Solicitors Act 1974, as £13,000 VAT remained outstanding and payment into a client account does not constitute payment to the solicitor. The Master was entitled to find 'special circumstances' under section 70(3) due to ambiguity over the settlement agreement, the Respondent's understanding of damages and costs, and uncertainty over the level of costs incurred. Delay did not cause material prejudice and was properly considered. The Master was not required to impose terms not argued below.
- Parties
- Appellant/defendant: Rippon Patel and French LLP; Respondent/claimant: Ronald Mowlam
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 May 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Senior Court Costs Office
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Assessment of Solicitors' Bills, Special Circumstances Under Solicitors Act 1974, Delay in Applications for Assessment, VAT on Legal Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rippon Patel and French LLP
Appellant/defendant
Ronald Mowlam
Respondent/claimant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Senior Court Costs Office
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the solicitor's bill had been 'paid' for the purposes of section 70(4) Solicitors Act 1974
- 2 Whether 'special circumstances' existed to justify a detailed assessment under section 70(3) Solicitors Act 1974
- 3 Whether the Master failed to consider delay and its impact on the exercise of discretion
Ratio Decidendi
The bill had not been fully paid for the purposes of section 70(4) Solicitors Act 1974, as £13,000 VAT remained outstanding and payment into a client account does not constitute payment to the solicitor. The Master was entitled to find 'special circumstances' under section 70(3) due to ambiguity over the settlement agreement, the Respondent's understanding of damages and costs, and uncertainty over the level of costs incurred. Delay did not cause material prejudice and was properly considered. The Master was not required to impose terms not argued below.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; detailed assessment of the Appellant's bill ordered; costs to follow the event and be subject to detailed assessment if not agreed; parties may make further representations on costs within seven days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment